Over-lawyering may not necessarily be a term that's top of mind to small business owners, but it's something they are innately aware of when it comes to lawyers. It's a key reason many small business owners don't engage lawyers, don't think they have any legal and risk issues and end up in situations or dealing with issues that could have been completely avoided.
Here's what over-lawyering is a nut shell: the excessive or unnecessary use of legal services or resources, typically involving an excessive number of lawyers, staff or legal resources for a particular matter or situation.
SO HOW DOES THIS IMPACT SMALL BUSINESS?
HOW DO YOU LMIIT OR AVOID OVER-LAWYERING?
Here's a real life example: I remember a particular situation where my client was selling a small business, and the lawyer on the other side needed to review the purchase agreement in order to get the deal finalized. This is standard practice and the other party should have had a lawyer reviewing information and advising them accordingly. It was a 9 page sale agreement; this wasn't a particularly complex deal and didn't need to be overly-complicated. The lawyer for the buyer made more than 150 redline edits, or suggestions, that they wanted changed in the agreement. Not a single one of them was a substantive change, made any changes to the deal, or changed any material portion of the agreement. Every single one of them was a change simply to allow the other lawyer to look like they were doing something, and rewrite language into antiquated legalese that served to say the same thing the agreement originally said, only in a more convoluted and complicated way. My client and I took one look at it, told the buyer we weren't going through it line by line, that there were no substantive or material changes suggested that required a meeting or conversation, and if they wanted to move forward they needed to sign the original version we sent over. It must have taken quite a few hours for the buyer's attorney to go through and make the redline changes, and all that time was being charged to the buyer, who wasn't getting anything of value out of it. It almost cost the buyer the deal and opportunity to make the purchase; for nothing more than over-lawyering and a lawyer looking to pad billable hours.
I have seen over-lawyering happen repeatedly; I'd say it's the standard practice across the legal field, with solo practitioners, small firms and large firms - it's going on across the board. Over-lawyering can be costly and counterproductive, and more importantly it doesn't result in any benefit to the businesses trying to access legal services and protect themselves. It's important to make sure your legal services align with your needs and objectives, strike the right balance between being cost-effective and beneficial and that there is communication between you and your legal service provider. Many of the unnecessary costs and complexities that lawyers throw at clients can be avoided.
Have questions about how to avoid being over-lawyered, or looking for small business legal solutions that are done differently? Contact us for a free consultation.